On Dec. Security and Overseas Interests. Adopted as official policy in November by President Gerald Ford, NSSM outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration , was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||12 January 2019|
|PDF File Size:||8.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Security and Overseas Interests. The Kissinger Report was made public when it was declassified and was transferred to the U. National Archives in Although the United States government has issued hundreds of policy papers dealing with various aspects of American national security since , The Kissinger Report continues to be the foundational document on U.
It therefore continues to represent official United States policy on government population control, and is posted on the USAID website. NSSM is critically important to pro-life workers all over the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and methods of the population control movement.
The primary purpose of U. The Kissinger Report states:. The U. That fact gives the U. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.
In order to protect U. The document identified 13 nations by name that would be the primary targets of U. Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U. Fund for Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U. This is desirable in terms of U. According to The Kissinger Report , elements of the implementation of government population control programs could include:.
The Kissinger Report also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up government population control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations—specifically the Pathfinder Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation IPPF and the Population Council—to do its dirty work. Just four examples are shown below. In fact, women whose underweight children were on government food programs were threatened with the withholding of this food if they refused to be sterilized, and others were kidnapped from their families and forcibly sterilized.
The nation accomplished this amazing feat by discouraging condom use and by changing the behavior of the people. Recently rates have declined back to 6. This continues to be financed by the US and other Western governments and foundations. As of there are no plans to stop sterilizations, but the Indian government is introducing free injectable contraceptives , which will also have major negative health impacts on women.
The Kissinger Report explicitly lays out the detailed strategy by which the United States government aggressively promotes population control in developing nations in order to regulate or have better access to the natural resources of these countries. The following outline shows the elements of this plan, with actual supporting quotes from NSSM :.
Throughout the implementation process, the United States must hide its tracks and disguise its government population control programs as altruistic:. The right of the individual couple to determine freely and responsibly the number and spacing of children and to have information, education, and means to do so; and The fundamental social and economic development of poor countries in which rapid population growth is both a contributing cause and a consequence of widespread poverty.
It is now increasing at less than one percent per year, and this rate is expected to continue to drop due to continuing population control activities. The Kissinger Report predicted that the population of the world would stabilize at about 10 to 13 billion, with some demographers predicting that the world population would balloon to as high as 22 billion people.
Now it is estimated that by population will level out at around 9. The worldwide application of the strategies recommended in The Kissinger Report has resulted in regional population growth rates decelerating so fast that they are already causing severe economic and social problems in Europe, the former Soviet Union, Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong. Many developing nations are now aging even more rapidly than the developed world, which foretells even more severe problems for their relatively underdeveloped economies.
The developed nations had the opportunity to become rich before they became old; if a nation becomes old first, it will never become rich.
The resulting push for population control in LDCs has borne absolutely no positive fruit in its decades of implementation. The first step in such a massive change in policy is, of course, to change our vision and our values.
In order to do this, we must repudiate old ways of thinking and outmoded ways of accomplishing our objectives.
The United States and the other nations of the developed world, as well as ideologically-motivated population control NGOs, should be supporting and guiding authentic economic development that allows the people of each nation to use their resources for their own benefit, thereby leading to an enhancement of human rights worldwide and healthier economies for all.
No human relationships are closer or more intimate than those found in the family. All that the tens of billions of dollars of government population control expenditures have accomplished is to make hundreds of millions of large poor families into small poor families. It is unfortunately left to our imagination to wonder what might have happened if these resources had been invested in health and educational infrastructure, and in research dedicated to finding peaceful strategies to transition nations from corrupt governance to truly representative and accountable courts and public service sectors.
Children are not an obstacle to development, they are the hope for the future of any society. People are not the problem, they are the solution. See the following two-minute video for more information on how population control increases, rather than decreasing, poverty. Well its states in our constitution those that have the ability Government or Elite have the responsibility to take action.
Now what are the responsibility well population control could be one. China should be down sized by all means nesessary in my book not the united states at about , All women in the world should hav there tubes tied at the age of 10 so they can live there lives with out getting pregnat by force by under age by wrong choice in there lives an cant get pregnat til the age of 25 if they chose to do so.
That way they can live free from the fear of bringing in babies to a world were there lives are not addiquit. No why not snip the male. Now the women would say well once a man is snip there is no coming back as a women can get un-tied an then can have kids but only 2 kids. With the man she marries if she is to divorce the man she with she will get her tubes tied an can never have kids with no other man same goes for the man he has kids an divorces his wife he gets snip an is not allow to have kids with other women that alone should stop both sides from having kids with everybody they get in volve with.
Is it crule an over controling not in my book it is comon sense to help keep the population down an help the planet as well an force the people to stay together which if they do they will be allowed to have 2 more children after 20yrs of being together if they are up to it. No ofcourse this New World Law will be implimented by the vote of all the people an government to try to understand that we need to do this for the World sake not just our own feelings.
This J. G of Spanish decent born as an American. Some people WISH they could make everyone on the planet do what they say, as if they are gods to be obeyed. As if the lies bogus science that they shroud themselves in is a regal cloak. Not going to work. They can keep lying and keep failing. The satanic new world order types are destined for destruction, and sooner than you think. And even prior to that, no reasonable, free people are going to subject their bodies to government dissection and domination like the poor, subservient chinese.
The are only the masters of fools, those too braindead to see through their lies. It said that population growth threatens US access to the natural resources of poor countries. A […]. Who is identified with the Global Climate Agenda?
Connection or not the vast majority of scientist say our planet is under siege and stressed. Some naysayers utter that the planet goes through climate change every 10K years or so. That is true. However, during this cycle one thing is different… Mother Earth is supporting, feeding and disposing of waste for 8 billion humans and 10s of billions of other forms of life.
Scientists say that Mother earth is under stress. Needless to say he will not get our vote. Is there further evidence?
The Artic and Greenland ice shelves are melting, seas have risen and there is evidence of a threat to costal communities. Moreover, human activity and encroachment into formerly pristine regions plays havoc on the ecology.
Then, look at our food producers. For strictly economic reasons they are injecting and spraying lethal substances into our food in order to speed maturity. This was followed through by the UN-population conference in Cairo […].
Any perceived need for global population control is no reason to do so using unethical means. That said, we know that Machiavellians are out there and will justify some distorted system of ethics in order to accomplish killing a significant number of people for the hope of the survival of their own progeny. It occurred to me that many of the questionable if not downright evil policies we face today are geared toward lowering the birth rate or generating death.
Aside from abortion, for example, take the whole homosexuality and transgender issue. What better way to keep people from having babies and getting them to willfully submit to sterilization? Also, I had not known about the Ugandan tactic. Another example may be the intentional arming of radical Islam.
What better way than war to get people killed off. On the other side of it, genetic research is moving along by leaps and bounds. The reason, I suspect, is that eugenics is the other side of the coin.
For those that remain, they want to ensure that all the genetic diseases are eradicated. Quite obviously drastic measures need to be taken such as no food aid to impoverished countries.
Look whats happened to Haiti as an example of the microcosm to the macrocosm. I agree with the eugenics and also prenatal testing with the abortion of problematic fetuses. I agree. These are difficult decisions to make but much more difficult will be watching our grand children suffer without basic resources that we now taken for granted.
We need to continue to promote population control but also promote minimalistic living. Imagine if the entire population of India suddenly had the desire to each have their own home and one or two cars.
We not only need less people. We also need to be using less resources. Tiny houses everybody!?!
Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda
It was classified for a while but was obtained by researchers in the early s. The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries LDCs is a concern to US national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development. The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries to control rapid population growth which the US deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States since the "U. It recommends for US leadership to "influence national leaders" and that "improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID. The countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth. It also raises the question of whether the US should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states deemed constructive in use of population control measures. The analytical section discusses projected world demographic trends and their influence on world food supply, minerals, and fuel.
National Security Study Memorandum 200
Thanks to everyone who has given so far to our End of Year Campaign! We still have a long way to go to reach our goal! The year has been significant for PRI in protecting mothers and their unborn babies. Your support has helped bring an ultrasound to our family care center in Nigeria, produced a petition telling the UN, abortion is NOT a human right, and strengthened family values globally through our educational efforts. Over , visitors have already come here to find answers this year, a record year for pop. And, our social media outreach has brought the pro-life message of hope to millions, another record for you and your work with us!
Never miss an update!
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? In , President Richard Nixon ordered his national security council, under the direction of Henry Kissinger, to study the implications of population growth to the interests of the United States and propose action. This classified study was called NSSM The study was concluded later that year, but Nixon was otherwise occupied, and did not act on the study. His replacement, Gerald Ford, would direct his administration to implement the memo.