This amendment will support provisioning systems that explicitly select traffic engineered paths within Provider Backbone Bridge Networks P These interoperable capabilities will be supported by SNMP MIB management of individual bridges, by extensions to the other control protocols specified in this standard, by the use of CFM with the addresses and VLAN Identifiers that specify traffic engineered connections, and by path protection switching capable of load sharing. This amendment will not take account of multidomain networks. An essential requirement of many provider networks is supporting traffic engineered paths. Complete route selection freedom must be allowed for a large number of connections.
|Published (Last):||5 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||1.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We'd like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest. Ethernet technology is not inherently scalable, and yet, Ethernet dominates LANs, and recently has diffused to access, aggregation networks, and MANs. Ethernet is even considered for transport networks in the backbone. In this paper we offer HETNA, a hierarchical Ethernet forwarding, which is compatible with legacy networks used by enterprises, carriers, and backbone networks, and provides scalability, mobility, protection, multicasting, and QoS support to intra- and inter-domain networks in an efficient forwarding manner.
The suggested architecture can handle streaming, real-time, multicasting, and other applications as well as various addressing mechanisms e. Both connection-oriented transport services and connectionless-oriented services are possible in the suggested architecture.
This architecture was simulated and prototyped, showing significant improvements over regular Ethernet in terms of buffers and control messages that enable this network to function. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Rent this article via DeepDyve. Avin, C. From trees to DAGS: improving the performance of bridged ethernet networks. In Proc. Barroso, J. Giladi, R. Hadzic, I. Hierarchical MAC address space in public Ethernet networks.
Kim, C. Myers, A. Rethinking the service model: scaling Ethernet to a million nodes. In HotNets. De Pellegrini, F. Scalable cycle-breaking algorithms for gigabit Ethernet backbones. Perlman, R. Rbridges: transparent routing. Rodeheffer, T.
SmartBridge: a scalable bridge architecture. Sharma, S. Viking: a multi-spanning-tree Ethernet architecture for metropolitan area and cluster networks. Spring, N. Measuring ISP topologies with rocketfuel. ETNA IEEE Standard IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks: virtual bridged local area networks, Amendment 4: Provider Bridges. IEEE P Draft standard for local and metropolitan area networks: virtual bridged local area networks—Amendment to IEEE IEEE Standard Download references.
Correspondence to Ran Giladi. Reprints and Permissions. Menachi, E. Telecommun Syst 49, — Download citation. Published : 29 June Issue Date : March Search SpringerLink Search.
Abstract Ethernet technology is not inherently scalable, and yet, Ethernet dominates LANs, and recently has diffused to access, aggregation networks, and MANs. Immediate online access to all issues from Subscription will auto renew annually. References 1. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. View author publications. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions. About this article Cite this article Menachi, E.
802.1Qay - Provider Backbone Bridge Traffic Engineering
Scalable, hierarchical, Ethernet transport network architecture (HETNA)